Why
China Needs a Countryside Code
每 by William Lindesay, director of International Friends of
the Great Wall.
Part 1: "Who are we if we cannot cherish the Great Wall?"
"Exodus to countryside created litter mountain" reported the South
China Morning Post on May 28th.
Due to SARS, wrote Benjamin Wong in Hong Kong's main English
language paper, 1.4 million Hong Kongers flocked to the region's
countryside parks during April. And they left an unprecedented amount
每 460 tonnes -- of garbage. Bins overflowed, park staff worked
a record
amount of overtime, and the government spent a record amount of
money, to clean up the mess.
As an environmentalist, and a Great Wall conservationist in particular,
the report worried me. I pondered what is going to happen
post-SARS when Beijing's cooped-up populace once again starts
heading for the hills, especially around the Great Wall?
Without SARS, Beijing's mountains and popular sections of Great
Wall were increasingly litter strewn. Post-SARS, people are
going to be more likely to get rid of their own garbage as
soon as they possibly can 每 on the spot.
And eventually, what they leave the city for 每 wilderness -- is
lost.
China's countryside is rapidly being despoiled by city people. So
what's to be done?
For three years, International Friends of the Great Wall, the society
I&n
Who are we if we cannot cherish the Great Wall?
Why
China Needs a Countryside Code
每 by William Lindesay, director of International Friends of
the Great Wall.
Part 1: "Who are we if we cannot cherish the Great Wall?"
"Exodus to countryside created litter mountain" reported the South
China Morning Post on May 28th.
Due to SARS, wrote Benjamin Wong in Hong Kong's main English
language paper, 1.4 million Hong Kongers flocked to the region's
countryside parks during April. And they left an unprecedented amount
每 460 tonnes -- of garbage. Bins overflowed, park staff worked
a record
amount of overtime, and the government spent a record amount of
money, to clean up the mess.
As an environmentalist, and a Great Wall conservationist in particular,
the report worried me. I pondered what is going to happen
post-SARS when Beijing's cooped-up populace once again starts
heading for the hills, especially around the Great Wall?
Without SARS, Beijing's mountains and popular sections of Great
Wall were increasingly litter strewn. Post-SARS, people are
going to be more likely to get rid of their own garbage as
soon as they possibly can 每 on the spot.
And eventually, what they leave the city for 每 wilderness -- is
lost.
China's countryside is rapidly being despoiled by city people. So
what's to be done?
For three years, International Friends of the Great Wall, the society
I founded to contribute to the protection of Great Wall, has
operated a ranger scheme at a section of Wall in Huairou County.
From it I've learned a lot about the phenomenon of littering.
The scheme has two components: farmers employed as rangers to walk
the trails and Wall and pick up garbage left by those visitors
who, for one reason or another, still litter despite seeing
one of our "green message notice- boards" 每 the second component.
Yes, the message "Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing
but footprints, keep the Wall wild and wonderful!" does fall
on a lot of deaf ears.
During the first year we hired a truck every three months to take
garbage to a land-fill site in Huairou. Last autumn we needed
the truck every month.
On the positive side, with investment in time, money, materials
and management 每 and most of all motivation to keep the Wall
and its surrounding landscape clean -- the site can be maintained
by "stewardship".
But if the scheme was stopped, the Wall would rapidly deteriorate
in environmental quality and become as bad as many others.
Why do so many people fail us, fail the Great Wall, and the beautiful
countryside in general? Despite our plea we estimate 70 percent
of visitors still just go ahead and drop their garbage. What
is the main reason for littering?
Five years ago as I was organizing my first Great Wall cleanup,
a colleague suggested, in a friendly but frank way, that I
should abandon the activity. "That's the government's job,"
he said "you should stick to what you really love, researching
the Wall."
His comment showed me what those 70 percent think: that it's not
their job.
But, if government were responsible, then other work would inevitably
be neglected. It's a massive job 每 and expensive -- to clean
up after 70 percent of 1.3 billion.
International Friends of the Great Wall, an under-funded NGO, has
used a considerable proportion of it's limited cash to date
to address a problem that need not exist in the first place
每 when there are many other serious issues to confront.
Nature has physically damaged the Ming Wall enormously in the last
350 years. Advancing desert sands, severe mountain weathering
and earth tremors have all taken their toll. What remains
now is the fragile soul of the Great Wall: even this is now
under modern attack, by man.
"Who are we if we cannot reach the Great Wall?" wrote Chairman Mao
in 1935 as he spurred on the Red Army during the Long March.
Nearly 70 years later it's never been easier to reach the
Great Wall: people have the money, weekends, holidays, cars
and good roads. Maybe now we should ask "Who are we if we
cannot CHERISH the Great Wall?"
We must learn to tread softly in this outdoor museum, not to scrawl
our names and thoughts on its 500-year-old bricks, to see
the Great Wall from a new perspective, not just as an ancient
building but as a landscape, not something that belongs to
us for use today, but something we all must help to preserve
for tomorrow.
But most of all we must CONTRIBUTE as individuals, each and every
one of us. In order to guide, support and encourage the growing
numbers of people visiting the countryside to play their part,
International Friends of the Great Wall has started to promote
a "Countryside Code".
Next week I'll introduce it to you: and ask you to take the pledge!
********************************************************* Part 2: Are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
The Countryside Code being promoted by International Friends of
the Great Wall aims at being a preventative campaign, rather
than a cure. In it, we are not asking people to do a lot,
but just to do what is socially acceptable, culturally acceptable
and environmentally acceptable.
Poetic as the slogan "Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing
but footprints" is, I also feel that people need to be provided
with a specific list of things to do, or not to do. To this
end I compiled a series of guidelines based on my experience
of encountering specific problems in the
countryside around Beijing, and internationally accepted environmental
standards. The Countryside Code is:
1. Take your own garbage home
2. Don't cross farmers' land 每 keep to paths
3. Don't shout unless it's an emergency
4. Don't smoke or let off fireworks
5. Carry your belongings in a rucsac to avoid use of plastic bags
6. Don't damage plants or flowers, or pick fruit
6. If you need to relieve yourself, cover up your business with
soil
7. Space in your rucsac on the way home? 每 pickup litter left by
others
8. Introduce others you meet to this Countryside Code!
Just before SARS struck Beijing, 35 members of the society spent
a day
promoting the idea to people heading up a mountain in Huairou towards
the
Wall.
Our station beside the path was simple: a notice with the guidelines
in Chinese and English, and a flag to sign for those willing
to take the pledge and make their peace with nature.
During the day we collected some 300 signatures 每 90 percent of
people passing were very receptive. Members took turns explaining
our purpose to passers by, and explaining the guidelines,
the most important of which was "please take your own garbage
home" (in Beijing for proper disposal).
By far, International Friends of the Great Wall is most concerned
about the environs of the Great Wall, but the Countryside
Code needs to be promoted and adopted nationwide to make not
only the Wall -- all of rural China -- a cleaner and more
beautiful place.
Among the other guidelines I should single out a few which aim to
solve particular menacing 每 and increasingly serious 每 problems.
As more people are in the hills they need to learn how to eco-shit
(i.e. perform the environmentally-friendly cover up). Piles
of shit are blighting trails, even the Wall -- some watchtowers
smell as bad as the worst hutong WCs. When shitting in the
woods just remember that while you don't want others to see
your backside, you should not pollute their eyes with what
comes out. The rule is "cover up your business with soil".
Two guidelines aim to help city folk nurture good relations with
farmers. So please "Do not cross farmers' land" and "Do not
damage plants or trees, or pick fruit". Farmers get extremely
angry seeing hikers traipsing across their planted fields,
and very irate seeing people pull up off to the side of the road
and helping themselves to fruit in their orchards.
Finally I'd like to draw your attention to the use of fireworks
which have become a major sound pollutant and fire hazard
in the last 18 months. They shatter the peacefulness of the
countryside, which is at such a premium in the modern world,
and they are a real personal danger. Some may say they are
a Chinese tradition and of course that's correct, but they are a
danger to those who manufacture them, a danger to those who
store and sell them, and a danger to those who buy them and
transport them.
Moreover, on the Great Wall explosives are no longer allowed as
they were 500 years ago. The Great Wall is a UNESCO World
Heritage: imagine how the use of fireworks would be treated
at other sites, such as the Temple of Heaven or the Forbidden
City?
If you've read this, please pledge to observe the Countryside Code.
Next time you are in the countryside, be responsible for the
environmental protection-awareness of your family, your driver,
your friends, colleagues, others in your group, and recruit
them to the campaign.
Ask yourself about these problems and ask yourself if you, personally,
can be part of the solution. If you are not part of the solution
then you must be part of the problem. There are only two sides.